Biggest Marketing Fails of All Time

One marketing blunder can make or break any brand. In this post, I am going to share with you a few of the worst marketing fails in history by brands we're familiar with.

Coca-Cola's 'New Coke' Flavor: Epic Disaster

In the 1980s, the rivalry between Pepsi and Coca-Cola was at its peak. Although Coca-Cola remained the market leader, Pepsi was closing the gap with aggressive marketing campaigns, including the wildly successful Pepsi Challenge in 1975. The campaign showed consumers preferring Pepsi in blind taste tests, putting pressure on Coca-Cola to respond.

To reclaim dominance, Coca-Cola launched "New Coke" on April 23, 1985—a reformulated version with a smoother, sweeter taste similar to Diet Coke, but sweetened with corn syrup. The company conducted taste tests with over 200,000 consumers, and a majority—53%—favored the new formula over the original. On paper, it seemed like a winning strategy.

However, when New Coke hit store shelves, the reaction was overwhelmingly negative. Coca-Cola's customer service lines were flooded with 400,000 calls and letters from outraged consumers who felt betrayed by the change. Some even stockpiled cases of the original formula, fearing they'd never taste it again. The backlash was so intense that, just 79 days later, Coca-Cola reintroduced the original recipe under the name “Coca-Cola Classic.”

What Marketers Can Learn From Coca-Cola

Coca-Cola's failure wasn't due to a lack of research—it conducted extensive testing, far more than companies like Gap did with its infamous failed logo redesign. The problem was that Coca-Cola underestimated the emotional connection consumers had with the original product.

• Brand identity matters. Coca-Cola's brand was deeply tied to nostalgia, tradition, and shared experiences. Changing the formula disrupted that emotional bond.
• Consumer feedback is more than data. While taste tests favored New Coke, they didn't account for sentiment. A product is more than just its functional benefits—it represents something deeper to loyal customers.
• If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Making changes to a successful product is risky. If consumers already love what you offer, think twice before making drastic modifications.

In the end, Coca-Cola's misstep became a masterclass in branding. By swiftly reintroducing the original formula, the company not only corrected its mistake but also reignited customer loyalty—Coca-Cola Classic's return led to a surge in sales, ultimately strengthening the brand.

---

The Schlitz Mistake: How a Marketing Misstep Toppled an Industry Giant

Up until 1977, the Joseph Schlitz Brewing Company was America's largest brewer. Its flagship beer, Schlitz, was so iconic that it earned the tagline, “The beer that made Milwaukee famous.”

Cutting Corners: The Beginning of the Downfall

In an effort to cut costs and increase production efficiency, Schlitz made a series of poor decisions that compromised the quality of its beer. The company switched to cheaper ingredients and adopted a brewing shortcut called accelerated batch fermentation, which sped up the process but led to a noticeable decline in taste and consistency.

Consumers quickly caught on. Sales started to drop, but rather than course-correcting, Schlitz made one final, disastrous attempt to save the brand.

The Infamous "Drink Schlitz or I'll Kill You" Campaign

Desperation led to one of the most baffling advertising campaigns in beer industry history. Schlitz's 1977 ad campaign, nicknamed “Drink Schlitz or I'll Kill You,” became a case study in marketing failure.

The commercials featured characters like a fictional boxer or a lumberjack with a pet cougar. When an off-screen voice suggested trying a beer other than Schlitz, they'd respond with oddly aggressive statements like:

“You want to take away my Schlitz? My gusto? … You're gonna be down for the count so long, they're gonna use a calculator.”

Instead of appealing to consumers, the ads came across as aggressive, confusing, and alienating. The backlash was immediate—so much so that Schlitz pulled the campaign after just 10 weeks and fired the advertising team.

But the damage was done. The company took a $1.4 million loss in 1976 (equivalent to $6.3 million in 2020). By 1981, Schlitz shut down its Milwaukee brewery, marking the end of an era. The failure was so notorious that it earned its own name: the “Schlitz Mistake.”

What Marketers Can Learn From Schlitz

Schlitz's downfall wasn't just about cost-cutting—it was a failure to understand brand identity and audience expectations.

• Brand loyalty depends on quality. Customers had come to expect a certain taste and experience from Schlitz. When the company changed the product to cut costs, it betrayed consumer trust.
• Know your audience. The “Drink Schlitz or I'll Kill You” ads were meant to be humorous and bold, but they instead came off as aggressive and alienating. A brand must align its messaging with its audience's values and perceptions.
• Test before you launch. If Schlitz had conducted focus groups or small-market testing, they would have discovered the negative reactions before rolling out the campaign nationwide. A/B testing, surveys, and audience insights are essential to preventing marketing disasters.
• A strong brand can't survive bad decisions forever. Schlitz had decades of brand recognition, but a few years of bad product choices and misaligned marketing were enough to destroy it.

Had Schlitz taken a different approach—maintaining product quality, listening to consumer feedback, and testing its ads before a full launch—it might still be a household name today.

---

Volkswagen's Dieselgate: Playing Dirty with Emissions

In 2016, Volkswagen found itself at the center of one of the biggest corporate scandals in automotive history. What started as an attempt to sidestep environmental regulations quickly spiraled into a global fiasco, tarnishing the company's reputation and costing it billions.

The Scandal: How Volkswagen Rigged the System

Volkswagen marketed its diesel vehicles as environmentally friendly, fuel-efficient, and low-emission alternatives to gasoline-powered cars. But behind the scenes, VW engineers had installed “defeat devices”—specialized software that could detect when a vehicle was undergoing emissions testing and alter performance to pass environmental standards.

Once these cars were back on the road, they emitted up to 40 times the legal limit of nitrogen oxides (NOx), pollutants linked to respiratory diseases, smog, and environmental damage.

VW's deception wasn't just a minor tweak—it was a massive cover-up. Nearly 11 million cars worldwide were affected, with models ranging from the Volkswagen Jetta and Passat to Audi and Porsche vehicles.

The Fallout: A $14.7 Billion Reckoning

When the truth came out, the backlash was swift and severe:

• Legal & Financial Consequences: Volkswagen agreed to a record-breaking $14.7 billion settlement in the U.S. alone—covering fines, legal fees, and compensation for affected customers. Globally, the scandal's total cost exceeded $30 billion.
• Plummeting Sales & Stock Price: Consumer trust took a nosedive. Sales in the U.S. and Europe dropped significantly, and VW's stock value plunged nearly 40% in the immediate aftermath.
• Executives Held Accountable: Several high-ranking VW executives faced criminal charges and prison sentences, including former CEO Martin Winterkorn, who was indicted for conspiracy and fraud.

In an effort to clean up its act, Volkswagen launched a massive rebranding campaign, investing billions in electric vehicle (EV) technology to shift public perception and move toward a more sustainable future.